2025:UHC:5171 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 19TH JUNE, 2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.411 of 2025 Mahesh Sharma ..…Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Ramji Shrivastava, Advocate. Counsel for the State : Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. This Application has been filed by the applicant Mahesh Sharma seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 11 of 2024, registered at Police Station Basant Vihar, District Dehradun under Sections 420, 120B, 467, 468 and Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2. As per the First Information Report dated 17.01.2024, the applicant is the father-in-law of the informant. He (informant) was an employee in his mother-in-law’s company S.G. Electricals. Applicant was the proprietor of G.P. Electricals. G.P. Electricals was converted into a partnership firm. Bharat Bhushan Bhatia and Poonam Bhatia became owner of 1 2025:UHC:5171 G.P. Electricals. Applicant formed a new partnership firm namely G.P. Electrical. After retirement from G.P. Electricals, the applicant received cheques from UPCL by giving fake bills in the name of G.P. Electricals. 3. Heard Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder for the respondent. 4. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate, contended that the applicant, aged about 66 years, has been falsely implicated in the present matter. He received the money in lieu of the work completed by him under the valid tender. He is a permanent resident of District Dehradun, therefore, there is no possibility of his absconding. Charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Applicant was granted interim bail on 30.04.2025. The conditions of the interim bail have not been violated by him. 5. Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder, has opposed the anticipatory bail application orally. 6. Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes 2 2025:UHC:5171 imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. 7. Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present Application, filed for anticipatory bail, is allowed and order dated 30.04.2025, granting interim bail to the applicant, is made absolute. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant Mahesh Sharma, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions:- (i) Applicant shall attend the trial court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment; (ii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case; (iii) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the trial court. 8. It is made clear that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court 3 2025:UHC:5171 for cancellation of the anticipatory bail. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dt:19.06.2025 Neha 4 NEHA BISHT Digitally signed by NEHA BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038ee7326b08b2d0e018 b01be753f014836d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452F32DE6BA960BFE64 D819EE44CA9CCE487B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.06.19 17:07:58 +05'30'