APHC010046222025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2619/2025 Between: 1. S RAJAMMA, W/O.LATE S.NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.4-313, HARIJNAVADA, CHINNATIPPASAMUDRAM, MADHANAPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MADHANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, MADHANAPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. PAGADALA NAGENDRA, S/O.NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/O.GOLLAMITTA, THANDAIVARIPALLI, CHINNATIPPASAMUDRAM, MADHANAPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. GOURA KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O.NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/O.GOLLAMITTA, THANDAIVARIPALLI, CHINNATIPPASAMUDRAM, MADHANAPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. GOURA RAGHU, S/O.NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, D/O.GOLLAMITTA, THANDAIVARIPALLI, CHINNATIPPASAMUDRAM, MADHANAPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. GOURA LALITHA, D/O.NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/O.GOLLAMITTA, THANDAIVARIPALLI, CHINNATIPPASAMUDRAM, MADHANAPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. GOURA NEELA, D/O.NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/O.GOLLAMITTA, THANDAIVARIPALLI, CHINNATIPPASAMUDRAM, MADHANAPALLI MANDAL, 2 CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 10. MACHA SIVA, S/O.NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/O.GOLLAMITTA, THANDAIVARIPALLI, CHINNATIPPASAMUDRAM, MADHANAPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 11. NAMBARU APPALLA, S/O.NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/O.GOLLAMITTA, THANDAIVARIPALLI, CHINNATIPPASAMUDRAM, MADHANAPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction, writ, more particularly Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 and 4 in not taking any action on the petitioners complaint dated 18.01.2025 as illegal, improper, unjust and contrary to law and to consequently direct the Respondent No.3 and 4 to take action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 18.01.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue an order, direction, writ, more particularly Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 3 and 4 in not taking any action on the petitioners complaint dated 18.01.2025 as illegal, improper, unjust and contrary to law and to consequently direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to take action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 18.01.2025 and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record written instructions and would submit that there are civil disputes between the parties, basing on the complaint given by Smt.C.Chandrakala, for the very same incident, a case in crime No.30 of 2025 is registered by respondent No.3, investigation is in progress, and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Considering the submissions, since there is a statutory remedy available to the Petitioner under BNSS, 2023, Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 04.12.2025 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 2619 of 2025 04.12.2025 Mjl /*