1 2025:CGHC:56360 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 414 of 2005 1 – Buddhu, Son of Patanga, Aged about 72 years, Caste-Sahu, R/o, Village Kosamtara (Setganga) Tahsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.). ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Navratan @ Munna, aged about 35 years, S/o Baisakhu, Caste- Sahu, R/o, Setganga (Khaira) Tahsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 – Shiv Kumar, Aged about 45 years, S/o, Janaklal Gupta. 3 – Mahesh Kumar, Aged about 40 years, S/o, Janaklal Gupta. Both R/o Khaira (Setganga) District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 – State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Ms. Tanusha Pathak, on behalf of Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Judgment on Board 19/11/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that she is having no instructions from the appellant. ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.11.20 10:54:46 +0530 2 2. From perusal of the order-sheets it transpires that on 22.01.2019, it has been reported that the sole appellant has died and a weeks’ time was granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to take appropriate steps. However, till date no steps have been taken for substitution of the LRs of the deceased appellant. 3. On 11.06.2025 also time was granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to remove the default, however, the default has not been removed as pointed out by the Registry. 4. Since the four appellants have already been reported to be died in the year 2019 itself, the present appeal is abated. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok