Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32874 WP No. 4196 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 4196 OF 2021 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
J RAMESH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O LATE JAVARAIAH, SHOP NO.07, MANDI MARKET, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001.
2.
NARAYANA G AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O LATE N. GOPALAIAH, SHOP NO.31, MANDI MARKET, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001.
3.
NARAYANA M S AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O SITHARAMU, SHOP NO.30, MANDI MARKET, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001.
4.
V GOPAL AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O LATE VENKATARAM, SHOP NO.63, MANDI MARKET, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001.
5. CHELUVARAJU
Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32874 WP No. 4196 of 2021
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O LATE CHALUVAIAH, SHOP NO.14, MANDI MARKET, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001.
6.
R MUKTAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, S/O LATE S. RASOOL KHAN, SHOP NO.42, MANDI MARKET, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.S. NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REPERSENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE MYSURU CITY, MYSURU-570001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR SRI. HEMANTH P., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. M.P. GEETHADEVI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICES DATED 21.01.2021 MADE IN REF.NO.R8(2)PR/255/2020-21 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2-MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE VIDE ANNEXURE-A TO A5 RESPECTIVELY AND ETC.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32874 WP No. 4196 of 2021
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
ORAL ORDER
1. The writ petition is filed, challenging the notices issued by respondent no.2 calling upon the petitioners to vacate their shops.
2. The
learned counsel for respondent No.2 upon instructions submits that the shops admittedly belong to respondent No.2 - the Mysuru Mahanagara Palike. However, the notices have been issued erroneously and hence, subsequently, the same have been withdrawn and appropriate proceedings under the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1974 have been initiated to have the petitioners evicted from the property.
3. It is seen that the writ petition pertains to issuance of impugned notices and nothing else. As the same has been
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32874 WP No. 4196 of 2021
withdrawn, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21