APHC010367462023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18897/2023 Between: 1. PERAM SOMASUNDARAM, AGED 45 YEARS S/O P.VENKATARAMANA, OCCUPATION. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT . KANDHUKURIVARIPALLI VILLAGE, CHINNAGOTTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY TO HOME, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522237. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, D.G.P. OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH - 522503. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. ANDHRA PRADESH - 517501. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DIVISION, TIRUPATI DIST., ANDHRA PRADESH 517001. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR /STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BAKARAPETA POLICE STATION, PILERU CIRCLE, CHINNAGOTTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517193. 6. P RAVI KUMAR, S/O P.VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT BAKARAPETA VILLAGE, CHINNAGOTTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -517193. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not considering the complaint lodged by the petitioner pertaining to the impersonation, forgery, illegal mutation and cheating related to ancestral properties by the 6th respondent is arbitrary, illegal, violation of natural justice and violation of Articles 14, and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 5th respondent to register the complaint given by me dated 22.05.2023 to the 3rd respondent and pass...” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.11.2025 ASR 183 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18897 of 2023 Dt.22.11.2025 ASR