Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55981 (ALL)

SMT. GUDIYA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/14751/2025 · 2025-05-22

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:88562 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14751 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Gudiya And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Narendra Kumar Yadav,Ramesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Amit Kumar Tiwari,C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live-in life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.63 of 2025, under Section 87 BNS, Police Station-Dauki, District- Agra, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 23.5.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad