[2025:RJ-JP:8528-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 71/2025 Vinod Kumar Son Of Shri Ram Niwas, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of E-25, Indira Colony, Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer Through Its Secretary. 2. Board Of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer Through Its Registrar. 3. Anant Kumar Pandya Son Of Shri Arvind Kumar Pandya, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of 373, Narayan Niwas, Chhota Akhada, Bhrampuri, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Abhishek Pareek. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 25/02/2025 This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 20.05.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12128/2010, while dismissing the writ petition, the learned Single Judge observed as under:- “On the erstwhile date i.e. 15.5.2024, none marked appearance qua the petitioners. When the matter was called today, learned counsel for the respondents Ms. Mumal Rajvi submitted that the selection process qua the post of ‘Patwari’, issued vide advertisement dated 11.07.2008, has culminated as on date. Therefore, the lis in question does not survive. [2025:RJ-JP:8528-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-71/2025] None has marked presence qua the petitioners to refute the above said contentions. Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, this Court believes that with efflux of time, the selection process is already over. Therefore, the lis in question does not survive as on date. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.” After hearing counsel for the appellant and the order dated 20.05.2024 as well as material available on the record, we find that two petitioners namely ‘Anant Kumar Pandey & Vinod Kumar’ filed writ petition before the learned Single Judge whereas, the appellant herein ‘Vinod Kumar’ has not filed any order of rejection issued by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission before the learned Single Judge. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the fact that the advertisement in question relates to the year 2008 and the appellant herein failed to produced any relevant document with regard to rejection order issued by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, therefore, no case is made out for interference by this court. In that view of the matter, the appeal is accordingly, dismissed. All the pending applications stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J MAHIMA/MG/50