SUNEEL KUMAR AND ANR. v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/2418/2014 · 2025-09-10
Ma Chowdhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5598 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5598 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2418/2014
Suneel Kumar & Anr.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
State of J&K & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (10.09.2025)
01. On the previous date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners had sought an adjournment to report instructions in the matter. However, neither representation on behalf of the petitioners nor the instructions have been reported, which suggests that the petitioners have lost interest to prosecute this petition any further.
02. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s).
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU
10.09.2025
Bunty
Sr. No. 24 Bunty Kumar 2025.09.11 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document