APHC010227232024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.11588 of 2024 Between: 1. SRI GUNISETTY NARASINHA GUPTA,, AGE 49 YRS S/O. CHINNA GUNNARAJU, R/O.D. NO. HIG-10, BV PRASAD PARADISE, DAFFODILL SCHOOL DOWN, MARIPALEM, VUDA LAYOUT VISAKHAPATNAM (AP)-530027 AND ALSO AT D.NO, 11-153,154,155,156,159, S.NO. 1/4, GOPALAPATNAM VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM (AP) ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT, ROOM NO.46, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI. 2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, RELIANCE HOME FINANCE LTD., DHRUV ARCADE, 3RD FLOOR, BEARING NO. 6-3-248 NAVEEN NAGAR, ROAD NO. 1, BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD (TS) - 500 034. 3. THE BRACH MANAGER, RELIANCE HOME FINANCE LTD., 47/11/5, MOHANS ARCADE, DWARAKA NAGAR, 1ST LANE, BEHAND SANGAM AND SARATH THEATER VISAKHAPATNAM (AP) - 530 016. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the impugned order Dt.01/05/2024, passed in I.A.No.1153 of 2024 in S.A.No.108 of 2024 on the file the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Vishakhapatnam dismissing without valid reasons in spite of payment of amount Rs.20,00,259/- to 2 the respondent finance company in pursuance of the orders Dt.25.03.2024 in I.A.No.1153 of 2024 in S.A.No.108 of 2024 without appreciation of the bona-fides of the petitioner is highly illegal, arbitrary and against the principle of natural justice and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to grant reasonable time for fulfillment of the orders Dt.25-03-2024 in I.A.No.1153 of 2024 in S.A.No.108 of 2024 passed in Learned Debts Recovery Tribunal at Vishakhapatnam. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGESWARA RAO V Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri Sunkara Charan, learned counsel represented on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner on record and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to file fresh Writ Petition with the same cause of action and the same is also endorsed on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty sought for. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 09.12.2025 Siva/JAK 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.11588 of 2024 Date: 09.12.2025 Siva/JAK