IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1965 OF 2009 Revision filed under Section 397 (1) and 301 of Cr.P.C., aggrieved by the Judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram in CrI.Appeal No. 56 of 2008 dated 28-07-2009 dismissing the Appeal filed by the petitioner and confirming the Judgment of the Additional Judicial Magistrae of I Class, Vizianagaram in C.C. No. 307 of 2006 dated 21-10-2008, convicting the petitioner of an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and sentencing him to undergo simple Imprisonment for one month and to pay a compensation of Rs. 4,000/- in default simple Imprisonment for 15 days, the petitioner begs to prefer the Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case. Between: Karri Jagadish Babu, Kothavalasa,S/o. Krishna Rao Hindu, Aged about 38 years. Railway Employee R/o. Kothavalasa, Near Railway Station, Kothavalasa, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. Shri Ram City Union Finance Ltd., Rep. by its Authorised Person, Sri N. Srinivasa Rao Vizianagaram. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. ^ ...RESPONDENTS f■ Oounsel for the Petitioner: SRI UPENDRA CHAKRAVARTHY f Cdunsel for the Respondents: SRI O UDAYA KUMAR (R-1) "Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER : t $ > IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) / [3521] / THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1965/2009 Between: Karri Jagadish Babu, S/o.Krishna Rao ...PETITIONER \ AND Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., rep. by its Authorized Person and another Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) UPENDRA CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.0. UDAYA KUMAR 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the respondent No.1, and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kothavalasa Police Station, Vizianagaram, submitted a report stating that the petitioner/Karri Jagadish Babu, who was a railway employee, died on 24.07.2010, and a copy of death certificate was enclosed, but it is not found in the report. However, i petitioner died on 24.07.2010, this Criminal dismissed as abated. in view of the fact that the Revision Case is liable to be 3. In view of the demise of the petitioner, dismissed as abated. There shall be the Criminal Revision Case is no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, If any pending, shall stand closed. SD/- IVI RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR * //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram 2. The Additional Judicial Magistrae Vizianagaram District. 3. One CC to Sri. Upendra Chakravarthy Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. O Udaya Kumar Advocate 5. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor [OPUC] 6. Three CD Copies Vizianagaram District, of First Class, Vizianagaram, [OPUC] High Court of A.P Amaravati SD HIGH COURT SD DATED:01/05/2025 \ ORDER CRLRC.No.1965 of 2009 5 J t JUL 2025 m ^ . Current Section .'.-9 DISMISSED AS ABATED THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE