Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55973 (AP)

KOSARAJU BHARATHI & ANOTHER v. KUCHIMANCHI VENUGOPAL

CMA/1118/2014 · 2025-11-12

Sumathi Jagadam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010242572014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1118/2014 Between: 1. KOSARAJU BHARATHI & ANOTHER, W/O GANDHI, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC: LANDLADY, RESIDENT OF D.NO.3-112, PEDAKADII, PEDAVEGI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. KOSARAJU NARASIMHA RAO, S/O GANDHI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.3-20-1/10/1, RAJA MOHAN RAJA NAGAR,GODARIGUNTA, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. KUCHIMANCHI VENUGOPAL, S/o Raghu Raju, Aged about 44 years, resident of D.No.5-1-84, Suryaraopet, Subhash Road, Kakinada, West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersagainst the order in I.A.No.200/2014 in 0.S.No.49712013, dated 26-6-2014 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CMAMP 1916 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including execution of exparte decree passed in O.S.No.497/2013, dated 26-62014 on the file of the court of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District IA NO: 2 OF 2014(CMAMP 40399 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. T S N MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he is unable to get instructions from his clients and requested this Court to dismiss the matter for non-prosecution. 2. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the appellants and since the appellants are not ready to prosecute the case, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.11.2025 TVN 219 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1118/2014 Dated: 13.11.2025 TVN