Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55968 (AP)

Smt P Lakshmamma v. State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary,

WP/4316/2017 · 2025-11-06

R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010587022017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4316/2017 Between: 1. SMT P LAKSHMAMMA, W/O. SIVA RAMAYYA, AGED 87 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O.9-37/2, ERRAGUDURU(V), PARNULAPADU(M), KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. P. KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O. SIVA RAMAYYA, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O.9-37/2, ERRAGUDURU(V), PAMULAPADU(M), KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. P. MUGALI MALLAYYA, S/O. SIVA RAMAYYA, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O.9-37/2, ERRAGUDURU(V), PAMULAPADU(M), KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. SMT G. ESWARAMMA, W/O. NADIPI ANJANEYULU, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. ERRAGUDURU(V), PAMULAPADU(M), KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. SMT G. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O. PEDDA ANJANEYULU, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. 7-41B, ERRAGUDURU(V), PAMULAPADU(M), KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. G. ANJANEYULU, S/O. CHINA RAMAKRISHNA, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, RIO. 7-41B, ERRAGUDURU(V), PAMULAPADU(M), KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. G. CHINA ANJANEYULU, S/O. RAMA KRISHNA, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. 10-125, ERRAGUDURU(V), PAMULAPADU(M), KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. P. SAI RAM, S/O. SANKARAYYA, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. 9-37/2, ERRAGUDURU(V), PAMULAPADU(M), 2 KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL. 3. TAHSILDAR PAMULAPADU MANDAL, PAMULAPADU, KURNOOL DISTRIC. 4. B SANJEEVA RAYUDU S/O VENKATASWAMY, R/O. ERRAGUDURU VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 5. M SEKHAR S/O NAGESH, R/O. ERRAGUDURU VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 6. M NAGARATHNAM S/O NAGANNA, R/O. ERRAGUDURU VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 7. I VENKATASUBBANNA S/O VENKATESWARLU, R/O. ERRAGUDURU VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 8. G PEDDA SAVARAIAH, R/O. ERRAGUDURU VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 9. M CHINNA NAGAIAH S/O RAMANNA, R/O. ERRAGUDURU VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 10. M NARAYANA S/O KASANNA, R/O. ERRAGUDURU VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 11. M SUBBANNA S/O CHINNA NAGANNA, R/O. ERRAGUDURU VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT RR 4TO11 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER C.O. DT. 14-11-17 IN WPMP 15832 OF 17 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 3 pleased toto issue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of land by demanding to vacate some portion out of the land of the petitioners to an extent of Ac.1-21 cents each situated in Sy.No.603, 616 and 402 of Pamulapadu(V & M), Kurnool District is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in violation of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners possession over the land to an extent of Ac.1-21 cents each situated in Sy.No.603, 616 and 402 of Pamulapadu (V&M), Kurnool District without following the due process of law and to pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 4696 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the orders passed in WP Mp No. 5188 of 2017 in WP No. 4316 of 2017 dt. 8-2-2017 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 5188 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent not to dispossess the Petitioners from the Schedule land to an extent of Ac. 1.21 cents each situated in Sy. No. 603, 616 and 402 of Pamulapadu (V&M) Kurnool District pending disposal of the Writ Petition IA NO: 3 OF 2017(WPMP 15832 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioners as respondents 4 and 11 in WP No.4317 of 2017 as well as WPMPNO: 5188 of 2017, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. P GANGA RAMI REDDY 4 The Court made the following ORDER: In view of the letter, dated04.11.2025, submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Date: 07.11.2025 KA 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4316/2017 Date: 07.11.2025 KA