1 2025:CGHC:58562 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9835 of 2025 1 - Golu Narayan Chakradhari S/o Pawan Chakradhari Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Gangouti, Out Post Basdei, Police Station And District Surajpur (C.G.) 2 - Mahesh Kumar Chakradhari S/o Jagdish Prasad Chakradhari Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Gangouti, Out Post Basdei, Police Station And District Surajpur (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Of Police Station Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.) ----Non-Applicant For Applicant : Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate For-Non-applicant : Mr. Ajit Singh, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 03.12.2025 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with Crime No. 378/2025, registered at Police Station Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh for the offences punishable under Sections 317(4), 318(2), 61(2)(A) of BNS and Section 66(D) of Information Technology Act. 2. The prosecution story in brief, is that, Joint Cyber Crime Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.12.16 18:55:25 +0530 2 Coordination Team Management Information System in a portal, it was found that there are different-different Branches of Bank, in which via forged mobile number, the amount was deposited and it was found that joint account was opened by the Golu Narayan Chakradhari (applicant NO.1), Dev Narayan Chakradhari, Mahesh Kumar Chakradhari and joint account was opened in the name of Jan Seva Shiksha Ewam Samajik Utthan as the firm was registered in this regard and the account was opened at IDFC Bank Branch Surajpur, in which the amount of Cyber Fraud was deposited and on being found that the amount was transferred in the account of Jan Seva Shiksha Ewam Samajik Utthan was deposited is the amount of cyber fraud, subsequently the matter being investigated by the police and it was found that in the accunt of Jan Seva Shiksha Ewam Samajik Utthan a sum of Rs.52,57,000/- was deposited and the applicants have been arrested for the commission of alleged offences. 3. Learned Counsel for the convicts/applicants have argued that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is pertinent to mention here at this juncture, the main accused of present crime is Dev Narayan Chakradhari, who is real brother of the applicant No.1 and cousin brother of applicant No.2 and during the course of investigation, the memorandum statement of applicant No.1 was recorded, in which he categorically stated that his elder brother Dev Narayan Chakradhari formulated the 3 trust known as "Jan Seva Shiksha Ewam Samajik Utthan", in which the applicant No.1 was shown as trustee and there is role attributed by the applicants for the commission of alleged offences. It is pertinent to mention here at this juncture, for the bare perusal of the seizure memo, it is reflected that the applicant No.1 was resigned from the trust, so prima-facie the involvement of applicant has not been proved. So far the applicant No.2 is concerned, there is no active participation done by him in respect of furtherance of crime. The applicant are in jail since 31.07.2025 and the appeal is likely to take some time for its conclusion, hence the applicants have filed the instant application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail. 4. An objection has been filed on behalf of the State/respondent. It was argued by the State Counsel that considering the offence committed by the applicant, they do not deserve to be released on bail. The findings arrived at by the learned trial Court is just and proper. 5. I have learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Having considered the nature and gravity of the allegations, the magnitude of the financial fraud involved, and the material collected during investigation, this Court is of the considered opinion that the applicants have not been able to make out a 4 case for grant of bail. The case diary reflects that the bank account of the trust “Jan Seva Shiksha Ewam Samajik Utthan”, in which the applicants were associated, has been utilised for deposit of an amount of 52,57,000/- alleged to be proceeds of ₹ cyber fraud. At this stage, this Court finds it appropriate to reject the instant application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail, at this stage. 7. OfÏce is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti