Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55964 (AP)

B. Trinadha Rao, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/28971/2025 · 2025-12-07

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010556402025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 28971/2025 Between: 1. B. TRINADHA RAO,, S/O. KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-2-3, LAXMUDUPETA, AMADALAVALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (APEWIDC), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (APEWIDC) SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 2 ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri K. Praveen, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Ramesh Babu Talluri, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning (Respondent No.1) and Sri L. Radha Krishna, learned Counsel representing Sri V. Ch. Naidu, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. 2. On the last occasion i.e., on 21.11.2025, Sri L. Radha Krishna, learned Counsel representing Sri V. Ch. Naidu, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 3, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer, APEWIDC, Srikakulam. Copy of the same was also supplied to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner. 3. The said Written Instruction would indicate that the net amount payable to the Writ Petitioner is Rs.4,94,156/-. This amount is not disputed by the learned Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner. 4. Since the amounts have been admitted, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this Writ Petition, with a direction to all the Respondents to complete the entire administrative process, including uploading of the bills, both inter-departmental and intra-departmental, by way of mutual cooperation and coordination, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of uploading of this Order on the website of this Court and transfer the due amount to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within four (04) weeks thereafter. 5. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit bank account details to the Competent Authority within four weeks from today, for effective compliance. 6. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 08.12.2025 Vns