Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55962 (AP)

Dasari Vimala v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/1256/2021 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010017282021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1256/2021 Between: DASARI VIMALA, W/O D.RADHAKRISHNAIAH, D.NO.14-388/2, AUTO NAGAR, TIRUPATI URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRL.SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT AMARAVATHI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PATTABHIPURAM, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAJENDRA C Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in not taking cognizance and in not registering the First Information Report dated 10.12.2020 given by the petitioner as illegal arbitrary unconstitutional opposed to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the First Information Report dated 10-12-2020 and to take necessary action and for such other and necessary orders.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that, the matter is 2 purely related to civil issues and as such, the Respondent – Police has not registered the case based on the complaint of the Petitioner. 3. Sri C.Rajendra, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.1256 of 2021 Dt.14.10.2025 Dinesh