Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 16485 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition inter alia with the prayer to direct the respondent nos. 2 and 6 to recovery the amount of Rs. 8,91,300/- in pursuance to the recovery certificate dated 06.03.2024 from the respondent no. 5 within a period stipulated by this Court and to deposit the same with respondent no. 4 for payment to the petitioner.
2. It is argued that though the considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no action has been taken, hence the present petition.
3. On the other hand, it is argued by the learned Standing Counsel that Respondent no. 2/District Magistrate, Farrukhabad, District Farrukhabad will do the needful in the matter, expeditiously.
4. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present writ petition is
disposed of finally permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh representation ventilating all his grievances before the respondent no. 2/District Magistrate, Farrukhabad within a period of two weeks from today along with certified copy of this order. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioners before the respondent no. 2 within the time indicated hereinabove, he is
directed to take appropriate action in the matter within next three weeks from the date of filing of such representation by the petitioners before him.
(Prakash Padia,J.) September 18, 2025/Arti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ranjeet Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad