127 SURYA SHARMA AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. not being paid the salary in accordance Development Authority (Empl respondents be the Rules. 2. the judgment of this Court in CWP No.15896 of 2023 titled Sharma and ors. Vs. St which judgment hence, the petitioners are entitled for th Punjab Urban Development Authority (Employee Service) Regulations, 1999. 3. being raised by the petitioner dated 22.02.2025, copy of which has been appended as Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13399 Date of Decision : 12 SURYA SHARMA AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Jatinder Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioners. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioners are not being paid the salary in accordance with the law under the Punjab Urban Development Authority (Employee Service) Regulations, 1999 hence, the pondents be directed to grant the statutory pay scale as envisage e Rules. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the judgment of this Court in CWP No.15896 of 2023 titled Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.”, judgment has been upheld upto the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India , the petitioners are entitled for the salary admissible to them under the Punjab Urban Development Authority (Employee Service) Regulations, Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance being raised by the petitioners have already been raised in the representatio dated 22.02.2025, copy of which has been appended as Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 13399-2025 Date of Decision : 12-05-2025 ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS ........Respondent(s) JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Advocate HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioners are with the law under the Punjab Urban oyee Service) Regulations, 1999 hence, the to grant the statutory pay scale as envisaged under Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the judgment of this Court in CWP No.15896 of 2023 titled “Saurabh ate of Punjab and ors.”, decided on 13.09.2024, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India e salary admissible to them under the Punjab Urban Development Authority (Employee Service) Regulations, Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance have already been raised in the representatio dated 22.02.2025, copy of which has been appended as Annexure P-13 JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioners are with the law under the Punjab Urban oyee Service) Regulations, 1999 hence, the under Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view “Saurabh decided on 13.09.2024, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India e salary admissible to them under the Punjab Urban Development Authority (Employee Service) Regulations, Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance have already been raised in the representation 13 but SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.12 18:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-13399-2025 -2- the same is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioners will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner. 4 Notice of motion. 5. On the asking of the Court, Mr. T.P.S Chawla, Sr. DAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that in case, the representation dated 22.02.2025 (Annexure P-13) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioners, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioners in the speaking order to be passed and the said order will be duly conveyed to the petitioners. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondent-State, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 7. Ordered accordingly. 12-05-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.12 18:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document