DEEPANKAR SINGH MANHAS v. VERGHESE SAMUEL,PR.SECY.HOME AND ORS.
CPSW/9900005/2010 · 2025-04-22
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5596 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5596 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 9900005/2010
Deepankar Singh Manhas
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Verghese Samuel & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (22.04.2025)
01. The record reveals that the instant contempt petition arises out of an order/judgment passed by this Court dated 22.05.2009, wherein the petitioner was directed to remove defects vide order dated 30.07.2010. The record further reveals that, till date, no notice has been issued in the instant contempt petition.
02. Today also, when the instant contempt petition was taken up, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant contempt petition, as no efforts have been made by the petitioner to remove the defects. The instant contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed.
03. Accordingly, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
22.04.2025
Bunty
Serial No. 59 Bunty Kumar 2025.04.22 22:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document