1 2025:CGHC:58549-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 544 of 2025 1. Yogendra Kumar Sharma S/o Govind Prasad Sharma Aged About 47 Years R/o Village - Khaira Setganga, Police Station - Fasterpur, Mungeli, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh 2. Smt. Shivkumari Sharma W/o Yogendra Kumar Sharma Aged About 45 Years R/o Village - Khaira Setganga, Police Station - Fasterpur, Mungeli, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh 3. Sachin Sharma S/o Yogendra Kumar Sharma Aged About 23 Years R/o Village - Khaira Setganga, Police Station - Fasterpur, Mungeli, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Director General of Police Chhattisgarh, Police Headquarters, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Superintendent of Police Mungeli, S P Office Mungeli, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh 4. Station In-Charge P.S. Lalpur, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh 5. Tehsildar Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh 6. Station In-Charge P.S. Fasterpur, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh 7. Station In-Charge P.S. - Mungeli, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.12.04 10:44:30 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Ms. Aditi Singhvi, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 03.12.2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers: “i. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the memo dated 25.08.2025 (unnumbered), issued by respondent No. 4 to respondent No. 5 as being illegal, arbitrary and beyond jurisdiction. ii. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent police authorities to conduct the investigation, if any against the petitioners, in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law. iii. Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court deems, fit in the facts and circumstances may also be granted in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Ms. Aditi Singhvi, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the present petition has become infructuous. 3 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State, is present. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan