Gurunath Sahu @ Gunanidhi Sahu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/47122/2018 · 2025-11-12
B V L N Chakravarthi
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55955 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55955 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010975322018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 47122/2018
Between:
1. GURUNATH SAHU @ GUNANIDHI SAHU, S/O LATE BRUNDAVAN SAHU, AGED ABOUT 58YRS, R/O CHARIGORA STREET, MANIKYAPURAM VILLAGE, KAVITI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KAVITI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.4 in interfering into the Civil disputes and further threatening the petitioner to remove the baddy from his property in spite of the Decree and Judgment dt.10.07.2014 in O.S.No.30/2010 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Ichapuram as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to enquire into the matter and to take appropriate action against the respondent No.4 and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to hold an enquiry immediately against the 4th respondent in connection with the issue mentioned in the Writ Petition and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.47122 OF 2018
ORDER:
Sri D.Purnachandra Reddy, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submissions made by the learned for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 13.11.2025 Pmk
4 13 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No:47122 OF 2018
Date: 13.11.2025
Pmk