Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55954 (AP)

K. Mahaboob Hussain and 4 others v. The State of Andhra Pradesh and 4 others

WP/1192/2019 · 2025-11-04

Ninala Jayasurya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010026082019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 1192/2019 Between: 1. K. MAHABOOB HUSSAIN AND 4 OTHERS, S/O KATIKA NABI SAHEB, R/O GONGANDLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. KATIKA NABI RASOOL, S/O KATIKA NABI SAHEB, R/O GONGANDLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. KATIKA AKBAR, S/O KATIKA BADI SAHEB, R/O GONGANDLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. KATIKA RAZZAK, S/O KATIKA BADI SAHEB, R/O GONGANDLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. KATIKA ABDUL, S/O KATIKA BADI SAHEB, R/O GONGANDLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 3. THE TAHASILDAR, GONEGANDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. THE MANDAL DEPUTY SURVEYOR, GONEGANDLA VILLAGE AND NJS,J W.P No.1192 of 2019 2 MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. N MUNEPPA, S/O GADILE BADE SAHEB, R/O GONGANDLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K V RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) NJS,J W.P No.1192 of 2019 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The writ petition is filed challenging the notice calling upon the petitioners to attend the survey proposed to be conducted on 05.02.2019. 3. As seen from the docket proceedings, it is noted that no interim orders were granted and obviously, the survey might have been conducted as scheduled. In view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication and the writ petition is, accordingly, closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:05.11.2025 Ksj