Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55952 (KAR)

SRI THIMMAPPA P v. SRI C T RENU KUMAR

RFA/960/2022 · 2025-08-12

K S Hemalekha

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31194 RFA No. 960 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.960 OF 2022 (DEC/PAR) BETWEEN: SRI THIMMAPPA .P S/O LATE VENKATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT NO.42B, 14TH CROSS, BSK IIIRD STAGE, ITTAMODU, BENGALURU-560085. …APPELLANT (BY SRI N. SURESHA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI C.T. RENU KUMAR S/O P. THIMMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.22, GOTTIGERE EXTENSION, RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR, BENGALURU-560098. 2. SRI C.T. RAVI KUMAR S/O LATE SRI P. THIMMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 3. SMT. C.T. SHOBHA D/O SRI P. THIMMAPPA, W/O SRI SATISH H.N. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 ARE RESIDING AT OLD NO.34, NEW NO.42B, OLD ITTAMADU VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, 13TH CROSS, ITTAMADU, BENGALURU-560 085. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31194 RFA No. 960 of 2022 THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.04.2022 PASSED IN O.S.NO.4184/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE XX ADDITIONAL CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PARTITION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. From the order sheet it is evident that on several occasions, the appellant was granted time to comply with the office objections. Today i.e., 12.08.2025, the matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for the 7th time. Neither have office objections been complied with nor is the appellant’s counsel present. 3. The matter is of the year 2022. 4. It, therefore, appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- ______________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34