IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.25214 of 2025 Annapurna Mohanty … Petitioner Mr. A.M. Das, Adv. -versus- Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation, BBSR & Others … Opp. Parties Mr. L.K. Maharana, Adv. (for TPCODL) CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 26.09.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Basing on the order dt.20.09.2025, learned counsel appearing on behalf of TPCODL contended that Petitioner is continuing in unauthorized occupation of the quarter so allotted in his favour by the authorities of IDCO even after his dismissal from services w.e.f 07.11.2015. 3.1. It is contended that basing on a letter issued by IDCO, power supply to the premises in question has been disconnected, IDCO being the owner of the quarter in question. p. 2 4. Mr. A. Das, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner on the other hand contended that in terms of the letter of allotment issued in his favour under Annexure-4, since Petitioner has taken power connection by paying the required fees, power supply cannot be disconnected without prior notice. 5. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and considering the submission made and the instruction provided to the Court, this Court is of the view that in absence of no objection from IDCO, power supply to the premises in question cannot be restored. if the Petitioner so likes, he can move to the authorities of IDCO, to get the NOC and after obtaining the same, he can make a prayer before the authorities of TPCODL to restore power supply. 6.1. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti