Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55949 (KAR)

CHANDRAPPA v. ANANDA S

CRL.A/394/2020 · 2025-07-29

S Rachaiah

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29081 CRL.A No. 394 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 394 OF 2020 (A) BETWEEN: CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT V.V.EXTESNION HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 114 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHIVASHANKAR K., ADVOCATE) AND: ANANDA S S/O SANJEEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT 6TH CROSS, I.B.ROAD ADJACENT TO SHIVA GARDEN HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU-562 114 …RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.11.2019 AND CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT PASSED IN C.C.NO.874/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HOSAKOTE DATED 16.11.2018. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29081 CRL.A No. 394 of 2020 ORAL JUDGMENT Case called out. The matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. However, learned counsel for appellant has failed to comply with the office objections despite giving sufficient opportunities. Therefore, it appears that he is not interested to proceed with the case. Hence, it is appropriate to dismiss the appeal for non-compliance of office objections. 2. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE JS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2