203-5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT RERHI FARHI AND THROUGH ITS DESIGNATED OFFICE BEARERS STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present Mr. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. P.K. Dwivedi, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. * ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA 1. This Writ Petition is tagged along with CWP which is decided by us under:- “9. District Street Vendors Dispute Redressal Committee, it is expected that the State of Haryana, such committee. In remedy but to approach this Court when the Act itself provides for a dispute resolution mechanism. 10. no.1 Corporation, Panchkula, to ensure that a committee in terms of the notification dated 08.10.2020, is constituted positively, within a period of 08 weeks from 11. seriously. 12. the year 2015, this Court d of, with scrupulously, comply with the provisions of the Act of 2014, and in IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: RHI ROJGAR BACHAO SANAGARH SAMITI, THROUGH ITS DESIGNATED OFFICE BEARERS V STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Rajiv Dhawan, Advocate for the Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. P.K. Dwivedi, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral) This Writ Petition is tagged along with CWP which is decided by us vide order of the even date wherein it is held as Once the statute clearly provides for constitution of a District Street Vendors Dispute Redressal Committee, it is expected that the State of Haryana, would take necessary steps to constitute uch committee. In its absence, the street vendors will have no remedy but to approach this Court. This situation is not desirable when the Act itself provides for a dispute resolution mechanism. In view of the above, this Court directs the resp no.1-State of Haryana, as well as respondent no.2 Corporation, Panchkula, to ensure that a committee in terms of the notification dated 08.10.2020, is constituted positively, within a period of 08 weeks from the date of passing of this ord Any violation of the above direction would be viewed seriously. Since the instant writ petition has remained pending since the year 2015, this Court deems it fit and appropriate to dispose it of, with the observation that the respondent authorities shall, scrupulously, comply with the provisions of the Act of 2014, and in IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10223-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23rd July, 2025 BACHAO SANAGARH SAMITI, PANCHKULA THROUGH ITS DESIGNATED OFFICE BEARERS .…...Petitioner(s) V/s. ......Respondent(s) ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA KULDEEP TIWARI Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. P.K. Dwivedi, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. This Writ Petition is tagged along with CWP-19495-2015, vide order of the even date wherein it is held as Once the statute clearly provides for constitution of a District Street Vendors Dispute Redressal Committee, it is expected take necessary steps to constitute absence, the street vendors will have no other . This situation is not desirable when the Act itself provides for a dispute resolution mechanism. , this Court directs the respondent State of Haryana, as well as respondent no.2-Municipal Corporation, Panchkula, to ensure that a committee in terms of the notification dated 08.10.2020, is constituted positively, within a the date of passing of this order. Any violation of the above direction would be viewed Since the instant writ petition has remained pending since fit and appropriate to dispose it the observation that the respondent authorities shall, scrupulously, comply with the provisions of the Act of 2014, and in SURESH KUMAR 2025.08.04 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10223-2016 (O&M) case of any violation of its provisions, the person aggrieved will have the remedy of approaching the District Street Vendors Dispute Redressal Committee which shall deal with such grievance as per law. 13. Disposed of accordingly.” 2. In view of the aforesaid, this Writ Petition is also disposed of in the aforesaid terms passed in CWP-19495-2015. 3. All pending applications, if any, in this case are disposed of accordingly. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] JUDGE [KULDEEP TIWARI] JUDGE July 23, 2025 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SURESH KUMAR 2025.08.04 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document