APHC010474422017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4112/2017 Between: 1. M/S. SRI SAI BALAJI FOOD PRODUCTS,, S.NO.509/ B, MOOLASAGARAM, NEAR POLA RESIDENCY, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 518502. A PROPRIETARY FIRM, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SMT. J. MAHA LAXMI W/O. J. RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.27/328, MOOLASAGARAM, NANDYAL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 518502. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ZONAL MANAGER, CANARA BANK, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE CHIEF MANAGER, CANARA BANK, NANDYAL BRANCH, 0/O. 25-516 A, SRINIVASA NAGAR, NANDYAL - 518501, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or orders more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in seizing the factory on 10.01.2017 as arbitrary and illegal, violates the Principles of 2 Natural Justice and Articles 14 & 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to direct the Respondents to reopen the Petitioner's Firm and grant three months time to repay the outstanding loan amounts to the 3rd Respondent Bank and also consequently direct the Respondents to stay all further proceedings proposed by the 3rd Respondent Bank, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 4939 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings proposed by the 3rd Respondent Bank, during the pendency of the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 16822 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to add as petitioner No.2 in the above writ petition proceedings being legal representative of the deceased petitioner No.1, who is the petitioner of M/s.Sri Sai Balaji Food Products by permitting the petitioner to contest the main writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VANGA ANITA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S SIVA KUMARI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 15.10.2025 SCH 4 230 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4112/2017 Date: 15.10.2025 SCH