- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24250 WP No. 31477 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 31477 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. CHANDAMURI PRIYANKA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS WIFE OF C.C.PRATHAP REDDY 2. MR. C.C. PRATHAPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, SON OF SUDHAKAR REDDY BOTH ARE RESIDING AT 4-58, TALAMARLA, ANANTHAPURA ANDHRA PRADESH - 515 133. PETITIONERS 1 AND 2 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER GAJENDRA .S SON OF SRINIVAS NO.21, 11TH A CROSS 1ST MAIN, ROAD NEAR HAPPY BIG BAZAAR PARAPPANA AGRAHARA BANGALORE SOUTH BENGALURU - 560100. 3. MR. SANKARANARAYANAN MURUGESAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS SON OF MR. MURUGESAN RESIDING AT NO. 734 3RD MAIN Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24250 WP No. 31477 of 2024 RAMESH NAGAR BANGALORE - 560037. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SARAVANA .S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BANGALORE - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. SATELLITE TOWN RING ROAD PLANNING AUTHORITY BMRDA OFFICE NO.01 ALI ASKER ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR BENGALURU KARNATAKA - 560052. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY AND JOIN DIRECTOR. 3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS XHGP + 2XQ, DR AMBEDKAR RD NUNEGUNDLAPALLI SAMPANGI RAMA NAGARA BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. 4. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER XHCM + PXC, KG ROAD NEAR DISTRICT REGISTRAR OFFICE AMBEDKAR VEEDHI SAMPANGI RAMA NAGARA BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560009. 5. GENURISE BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER INDIAN COMPANIES ACT OF 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24250 WP No. 31477 of 2024 AT NO.444, GRAND, 3RD FLOOR 16TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN HSR LAYOUT, SECTOR-6 BENGALURU - 560102 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. MADHUSUDHAN TALAMARLA 6. OFFICE OF GRAMA PANCHAYAT MUGULUR, SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 562125. 7. T.N. CHANDRAIAH AGED MAJOR FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN RESIDING AT THINDLU VILLAGE SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562016. 8. THE TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE COMPLEX PM6V + 2VF, VINAYAKA NAGAR ANEKAL, KARNATAKA - 562106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.K. KENCHE GOWDA, AGA FOR R1, R3, R4 AND R8; SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. BHARATH .K, ADVOCATE FOR R5; SRI. M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R6; SRI. KETHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R7) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 22-08-2024 AT ANNEXURE-N BEARING NO. STRRPA/TP/LAO/31/2019-20 ISSUED BY THE R2 AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS THERETO AS WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24250 WP No. 31477 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The counsel have today filed a joint compromise petition indicating that petitioners and respondents 5 and 7 have amicably given quietus to the disputes in terms of the settlement indicated in the joint compromise petition which is now filed before this Court. 2. Along with the joint compromise petition, a joint development agreement entered into between respondents 5 and 7 is also annexed accompanied by General power of attorney. 3. This Court has interacted with the petitioners as well as respondents No.5 and 7. Upon such interaction, it is placed on record that none of the parties who are signatories to the joint compromise petition have raised any allegations of coercion, duress, or undue influence. All the signatories have unequivocally affirmed the contents of the joint compromise petition and the recitals contained - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24250 WP No. 31477 of 2024 in the Joint Development Agreement. The compromise appears to be lawful and is entered into voluntarily, with full consent of the parties. Accordingly, the compromise petition is accepted and taken on record. 4. In light of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the joint compromise petition. The Joint Development Agreement shall be treated as an integral part of the said compromise petition. 5. In view of the above settlement, the show cause notice dated 22.08.2024 issued by respondent No.2, which is produced at Annexure–N, is rendered infructuous and is accordingly quashed and set aside. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE ALB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52