HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 15947 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. Sri Arun Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause of action survives in the present writ petition and same has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sri Yogendra Kumar Pandey Advocate holding brief of Sri Ajay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 is present. October 10, 2025 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Mishra, Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajay Singh, Narendra Kumar Tiwari (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Chunnilal Since Deceased .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad