RATTAN SINGH @ RATTEN SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRM-M/26155/2025 · 2025-08-06
N S Shekhawat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55930 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55930 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-26155-2025 -1- 210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26155-2025 Date of Decision:06.08.2025 Rattan Singh @ Ratten Singh and others …Petitioners vs. State of Haryana and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. G.S.Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Harnanak Singh, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No. 587 dated 13.10.2024 registered under Sections 115, 190, 191(3), 118(1), 118(2), 3(5), 351(3) of BNS, at Police Station Gharaunda, District Karnal (Annexure P-1) (Sections 190, 190(3) were deleted during investigation and 118(1), 118(2), 3(5) of BNS were added) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 01.05.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. Vide order dated 14.05.2025, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 01.05.2025 (Annexure P-2). 3. Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Karnal and got their statements HEMLATA 2025.08.07 06:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-26155-2025 -2- recorded. Report dated 12.06.2025 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners. 6.
Resultantly, FIR No. 587 dated 13.10.2024 registered under Sections 115, 190, 191(3), 118(1), 118(2), 3(5), 351(3) of BNS, at Police Station Gharaunda, District Karnal (Annexure P-1) (Sections 190, 190(3) were deleted during investigation and 118(1), 118(2), 3(5) of BNS were added) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 01.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 06.08.2025
JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2025.08.07 06:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document