Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55926 (PNJ)

DEEPU ALIAS PARDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/25578/2025 · 2025-08-11

Yashvir Singh Rathor

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S. No.269 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM-M-25578 of 2025 Date of Decision:11.08.2025 Deepu @ Pardeep Singh and others .....Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present:- Mr. Arpan Sabharwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gauravdeep Singh Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Sumit Kalyan, Advocate for Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** Yashvir Singh Rathor, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of F.I.R. No.102 dated 03.06.2024, registered under Sections 452/323/379/427/148/149 IPC at Police Station Ajnala, District Amritsar Rural and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise. 2. This Court vide order dated 07.07.2025 had directed the parties to ap- pear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send his/her report qua the genuineness of the compromise. RENU 2025.08.11 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-25578 of 2025 -2- 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ajnala and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 19.07.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 6. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R. following the prin- ciples laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and all subsequent pro- ceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise qua petitioner(s), are hereby quashed. 7. Pending application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Yashvir Singh Rathor) Judge August 11, 2025 renu Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RENU 2025.08.11 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh