V RAMA MURTHY REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/33157/2023 · 2025-11-21
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55923 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55923 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010642402023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33157/2023 Between:
1. V RAMA MURTHY REDDY, S/O. GOVINDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RYO. 9-49, MUSALAYAGARI PALLI, VEPANJERI P,
GANGADHARA NELLORE, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH-517 125. 2. V.BHAGYA,, W/O. RAMA MURTHY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. 9-49, MUSALAYAGARI PALLI, VEPANJERI P, GANGADHARA NELLORE, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH-517 125
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GANGADHAR NELLORE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S., GANGADHAR NELLORE, GANGADHAR NELLORE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. SRI KAVYA, W/O. VISHAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, NO.31, 2ND CROSS, MANJUNTHA LAYOUT, RTO ROAD, K.R.PURA, BENGALURU CITY,KAMATAKA STATE. 6. A C REDDY, , S/O. NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCE BUSINESS, R/O. NO.31, 2ND CROSS, MANJUNTHA LAYOUT, RTO ROAD, K.R.PURA, BENGALURU CITY,KAMATAKA STATE. 7. USHA, W/O. A.C. REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OEC HOUSE WIFE, NO.31, 2ND CROSS, MANJUNTHA LAYOUT, RTO ROAD, K.R.PURA, BENGALURU CITY,KAMATAKA STATE. 8. SRIKANTHA REDDY, S/O. A.C. REDDY, R/O. NO.31, 2ND CROSS, MANJUNTHA LAYOUT, RTO ROAD,
K.R.PURA, BENGALURU CITY,KAMATAKA STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. Y MAHA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents police in not registering the FIR basing on the complaint dated 11.11.2023 filed by the Petitioners even though received by the respondents police is highly illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violation of apex court rulings held in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Govt, of UP and ors and as well as Cr.P.C and consequently direct the respondents police to register the FIR basing on the complaint of the Petitioners dated 11.11.2023 in the interest of justice.”
2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that there is a crime pending against the Petitioners before K.R.Pura Police Station, Bangalore.
It is further submitted that there are family disputes between the parties relating to property. The contents of the complaint given by the Petitioners are purely civil in nature, and as such, Police have not registered any case based on the said complaint. 3. Ms.Y.Mahalakshmi, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.33157 of 2023
Dt.22.11.2025
Dinesh