Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5592 (UTT)

ASHOK KUMAR v. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

WPMS/1174/2025 · 2025-04-25

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 26D WPMS No. 1174 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Hemant Dangwal, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Siddharth Jain, Advocate for the respondent no.5. The petitioner seeks direction that the respondent no.3 may be directed to decide his application dated 06.03.2025 by which he has sought permission to cut the trees standing on his agricultural fields so that he may repay the loan. As also, seeks direction that the respondent no.4 may be directed not to proceed with the recovery citation till the application dated 06.03.2025 is decided by the respondents. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that restricts his prayer to prayer “A” seeking mandamus so as to direct the respondent no.3 to decide the application dated 06.03.2025 filed by the petitioner which is Annexure 6 Learned State counsel submits that the application dated 06.03.2025 filed by the petitioner would be decided within a period of three weeks. The Court takes on record the statement made by the learned State counsel. The writ petition stands disposed of with the direction to the respondent no.3 to decide the representation dated 06.03.2025 submitted by the petitioner within a period of three weeks. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 25.04.2025 Jitendra