Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5592 (GAU)

SIRAJUL HOQUE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/170/2025 · 2025-01-19

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No. 1/2 GAHC010005952025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/170/2025 SIRAJUL HOQUE S/O SAFIQUE ALI, VILL- ILASHPUR, P.O.-BARAIGRAM, DIST- SRI BHUMI (ASSAM) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-37 4:THE DISTRICT DELIMITATION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SRI BHUMI (ASSAM) PIN-78871 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N H LASKAR, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., SC, A S E C,GA, ASSAM Page No. 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 20.01.2025 Mr. N.H. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to file afresh. Mr. K. Konwar, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam for the respondent nos. 1, 3 & 4 and Mr. R. Dubey, learned Standing Counsel, Assam State Election Commission for the respondent no. 2, who are in attendance, have submitted that they have no objection if the writ petition is withdrawn, with the liberty. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition stands dismissed, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant