Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5592 (BOM)

PRUTHVIRAJ SHIVAJIRAO SATHE AND OTHERS v. SHIRISH SHIVAJIRAO PANDE AND OTHERS

WP/573/2024 · 2025-05-09

Shri R M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 of 4 908-WP.8111.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 WRIT PETITION NO. 8111 OF 2024 MAHESH BALASAHEB LOMTE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER 1 AND OTHERS ... Mr. Vishwamber Digamberrao Gunale, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. V. Adwant, Advocate for Respondent No.8. Mr. Ganesh Asaram Gadhe, Advocate for Respondent No.13. Mr. Swapnil S. Rathi, Advocate for Respondent No.16. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 573 OF 2024 PRUTHVIRAJ SHIVAJIRAO SATHE AND OTHERS VERSUS SHIRISH SHIVAJIRAO PANDE AND OTHERS … Mr. P. R. Katneshwarkar a/w. Mr. Aummaheshwari S. Jadhav, Advocate for Petitioner Nos.2, 5 to 6, 8 to 9 and 12, 13. Mr. Sunil V. Warad i/b. Mr. Kedar Warad, Advocate for Respondent No.12. … WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 576 OF 2024 PRUTHVIRAJ SHIVAJIRAO SATHE AND OTHERS VERSUS SARANG ARUJ PUJARI AND OTHERS … Mr. P. R. Katneshwarkar i/b. Mr. A. S. Jadhav, Advocate for Petitioner Nos.2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11 and 13. Mr. Sunil V. Warad i/b. Mr. Kedar Warad, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Rajendra L. Kute, Advocate for Respondent No.10. … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3345 OF 2024 IN WP/573/2024 GIRISH ARUN PUJARI AND ORS VERSUS 2025:BHC-AUG:14092 2 of 4 908-WP.8111.2024 PRUTHVIRAJ SHIVAJIRAO SATHE AND OTHERS … Mr. S. S. Thombre i/b. Mr. Saisagar A. Ambilwade, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Ganesh A. Gade, Advocate for Respondent No.13. Mr. R. L. Kute, Advocate for Respondent No.8. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3344 OF 2024 IN WP/576/2024 GIRISH ARUN PUJARI AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH TAHASILDAR AND ORS … Mr. S. S. Thombre i/b. Mr. Saisagar A. Ambilwade, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Sunil V. Warad i/b. Mr. Kedar Warad, Advocate for Respondent No.1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4989 OF 2025 IN WP/8111/2024 GANESH SHANKARRAO MASNE VERSUS MAHESH BALASAHEB LOMTE AND OTHERS … Mr. Amol V. Joshi, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. S. V. Adwant, Advocate for R/8 and R/12 in WP. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7350 OF 2024 GIRDHARILAL NANDLAL BHARADIYA AND OTHERS VERSUS SATISH BHAGWANRAO LOMTE AND OTHERS … Mr. P. R. Katneshwarkar a/w. Mr. Aummaheshwari S. Jadhav, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. V. Adwant, Advocate for R/5. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8094 OF 2024 3 of 4 908-WP.8111.2024 MAHADU JOGUJI MHASKE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER I AND OTHERS … Mr. Shrinivas Abhimanyu Ambad, Advocate for the Petitioner. … WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7349 OF 2024 BALASAHEB BABURAO SHEP VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS … Mr. Sambhaji G. Munde, Advocate for the Petitioner. … WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8099 OF 2024 SHASHIKANT GOPINATHRAO LOMTE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS … Mr. Vasant Digambarrao Salunke, Advocate for the Petitioners. … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8727 OF 2024 IN WP/7349/2024 AMOL VIJAYKUMAR LOMTE VERSUS BALASAHEB BABURAO SHEP AND OTHERS … Mr. S. V. Adwant, Advocate for Applicant. ... CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 9th MAY, 2025 P.C.:- 1. This Court is informed that First Appeal No.2877 of 2023 is decided by this Court vide judgment 6th May 2025. By the judgment 4 of 4 908-WP.8111.2024 and order passed by learned District Judge-3, Ambajogai, District Beed in Trust Appeal No.1 of 2019 dated 28th February 2023, so also, order dated 19th November 2016, passed by Assistant Charity Commissioner, Beed in Scheme Application No.257 of 2006 and 258 of 2006 stood set aside. The matter is remanded to the Assistant Charity Commissioner for fresh decision. 2. Learned Advocate for both sides agree that in view of this order, the present petitions have become infructuous. 3. Petitions, therefore, stand disposed of as infructuous. 4. Needless to say that the issues raised by the parties herein, if occurs for consideration of any Court in future, the same are specifically kept open. 5. In view of disposal of writ petitions, civil applications do not survive and they are also disposed of. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Tauseef