Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5591 (RAJ)

NAIMUDDIN KHAN S/O BHURA KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1955/2025 · 2025-02-06

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1955/2025 Naimuddin Khan S/o Bhura Khan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Darda Turki, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur 2. The Director Elementary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner 3. Chief District Education Officer, Elementary Education Ajmer 4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG with Mr. Ashutosh Udawat and Mr. Prateek Saxena JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/02/2025 1. Issue notice to the respondents. 2. Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG accepts notices on behalf of the respondents. 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Kusum Kumari Pareek vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (SB Civil Writ Petition No.10050/2019), on 07.08.2019. Counsel (2 of 2) [CW-1955/2025] submits that a liberty be granted to the petitioner to file a representation in the office of the respondents and they be directed to consider and decide the same in the light of the order passed in the case of Kusum Kumari Pareek (supra). 4. Counsel for the respondents has no objection, if such direction is issued. 5. Considering the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation in the office of the respondents. 6. The respondents are expected to decide the same expeditiously, as early as possible, strictly in accordance with law. 7. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/13