Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55904 (PNJ)

JAIPAL SINGH v. AJMER SINGH AND ORS.

FAO/833/2006 · 2025-05-23

Sudeepti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 218 FAO-833-2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 02, 2025 Jai Pal Singh ......Appellant Vs. Ajmer Singh and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, DAG, Haryana for respondents No.2 and 3 Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.4 ---- SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) This case falls in the category of old cases. On the last date of hearing, no one had put in appearance on behalf of the appellant and Registry was directed to inform the appellant about the date fixed. Despite being informed, today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is no more interested in pursuing the matter. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. The Insurance Company is hereby directed to disburse the current scheduled fee to Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate within a period of 20 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, in view of the order dated 18.07.2024 passed in FAO No.1682 of 2007, by this Court. 4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE May 02, 2025 sonia arora Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes / No Whether reportable: Yes / No Sonia Arora 2025.05.05 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document