Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5589 (KAR)

SRI SRINIVAS v. SRI B PRASAD KUMAR

CRL.RP/626/2023 · 2025-03-12

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4684 CRL.RP No. 626 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 626 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SRI SRINIVAS S/O. MUTHU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OFFICE AT PROPRIETOR, M/S. SRINIVAS EARTH MOVERS, NO.15/19, OPP MAREMMA TEMPLE, NEAR VALMIKI CIRCLE, DARM ROAD, HOSAPETE, VJAYANAGAR DISTRICT-583225.. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VENKATARAMAN M., ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: SRI B. PRASAD KUMAR SON OF B. BHARMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OFFICE AT PROPRIETOR M/S. SHREYAS LOGISTICS, R/O. AZAD NAGAR, 2ND CROSS, 22ND WARD, HOSAPTE, BELLARY DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI AMIRKHAN A. PATHAN, ADVOCATE) CRL.RP FILED U/S.397 R/W. 401 CR.P.C PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO CALL FOR RECORDS OF THE CRL.A.NO.5022/2019 DISPOSED ON 20.04.2022 BEFORE THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT HOSAPETE ANNEXURE B AND TO CALL FOR RECORDS OF THE C.C.NO.174/2013 (OLD C.C.NO.953/2012) DISPOSED ON 01.06.2018 BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOSAPETE, AT ANNEXURE A, TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT IN THE CRL.A.NO.502/2019 DISPOSED ON 20.04.2023 BEFORE THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE ANNEXURE-B, AT HOSAPETE. TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT IN THE C.C.NO.174/2013 (OLD C.C.NO.953/2012) DISPOSED ON 01.06.2018 BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HOSAPETE AT ANNEXURE-A TO ALLOWING THE PETITION AND ACQUITTING THE PETITIONER. V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.03.17 10:38:55 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4684 CRL.RP No. 626 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Case called twice. None appears for the revision petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner consistently absent. Accused who suffered an order of conviction for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I.Act, matter is not yet admitted. Though the revision petition came to be filed on 17.05.2023. Accordingly, revision petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AC CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 15