Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55883 (AP)

K C GANGANNA v. K SESHA PANI

CC/2562/2025 · 2025-11-06

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010410852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2562/2025 Between: 1. K C GANGANNA, S/O. LATE MUNEPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC F.P.SHOP DEALER, F.P.SHOP.NO.1381007, R/O. D.NO. 1/1252-1, HBS COLONY, YEMMIGANURTOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. K SESHA PANI, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC THE TAHSILDAR, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518360 2. M CHANDRA KALA, , W/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518360 3. S NARESH, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC VRA, YEMMIGANUR VILLAGE, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518360 4. NARESH, , S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC COMPUTER OPERATOR, TAHSILDAR OFFICE, 2 YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518360 5. ABDUL MANSOOR BASHA, , S/O. A SUBHAN MIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, H.NO. 1-1239, GEETHA NAGAR, YEMMIGANUR-518360, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the contemnors/respondents under the provisions of contempt of the courts Act for willfully and wontedly violating the orders of this Hon'ble High Court in W.P. No. 15446 of 2025 dated 27.06.2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to implead the proposed respondent No.2 to 5 herein as Respondents in C.C. of 2025 for disobeying the order dated 27-06-2025 passed in W.P.No.15446 of 2025 and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KALE VIJAYA RAJU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KAKARLA CHANDRA SEKHAR 2. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU 3. The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order under contempt is complied with. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is place on record. In these circumstances, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt.07.11.2025 SR