- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27589 WP No. 19286 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 19286 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT G ROOPA W/O SRI MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO.131, NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE KATHRUGUPPE, BSK III RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085, REPRESENTED BY HER HUSBAND CUM GPA HOLDER, SRI MUNIYAPPA, S/O SRI VAJRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SMT. YAMINI MUNIRAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI SATHISH CHANDRA S K S/O SRI KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 2. SMT. SHYMALA, W/O. SRI SATISH CHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R1 AND R2 ARE RESIDING AT NO.9 AND 10, OPP. SSM SCHOOL, MANJUNATH COLONY SLUM, BSK III RD STAGE, BENGALURU 560 028. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27589 WP No. 19286 of 2025 3. M/S BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK, BENGALURU -560 056 REPRESENTED BY IT'S COMMISSIONER 4. M/S BRAHMI CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO. 1030, 4TH M BLOCK, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010. REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING DIRECTING THE TRIAL COURT (THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 AND 2) TO ADJUDICATE AND DISPOSE OF THE SUIT IN O.S.NO.26330/2022 PENDING ON ITS FILE, WITHIN A TIME-BOUND FRAME, PREFERABLY WITHIN A PERIOD OF 8 MONTHS, OR CONSEQUENTLY DIRECTING THE HON’BLE TRIAL COURT TO DISPOSE THE PENDING APPLICATIONS WITHIN TIME BOUND MANNER IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is the plaintiff, is at the doors of this Court seeking a direction for expeditious conclusion of the proceedings in O.S.No.26330/2022, a suit filed for declaration and possession. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27589 WP No. 19286 of 2025 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner taking this Court through the documents appended to the petition would seek to demonstrate that the subject suit is not the first in line, but the saga of the suits begins from 2013 itself, and at every point in time, the concerned Court did not pass necessary orders in any of its proceedings. As an illustration, learned counsel would submit that the matter was pending for issuance of notice, even after 8 months from the date of institution of the suit. 3. In the light of the aforesaid submission and the suit being of the year 2022, I deem it appropriate to direct the concerned Court to conclude the proceedings with an outer limit of nine months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, if not earlier. 4. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition stands allowed. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40