Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30916 WP No. 20688 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 20688 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI R.K.SRINIVAS S/O LATE KALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/AT RAMENAHALLI VILLAGE HALLYMYSORE HOBLI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 211. …PETITIONER (BY SRI ROOPESHA B., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
2. RAMACHANDRA S/O LATE KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
3. JAYANNA S/O LATE KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30916 WP No. 20688 of 2025
4. R.S.RAGHAVENDRA S/O R.K.SHRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
5. R.K.KUMARASWAMY S/O LATE KALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
6. SUSHEELAMMA S/O SRIKANTAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
7. NATARAJA S/O LATE SRIKANTAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT RAMENAHALLI VILLAGE HALLYMYSORE HOBLI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 211. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN OS NO. 237/2022 WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE HON’BLE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HOLENARASIPURA;
QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21.04.2025 PASSED ON IA NO. VI FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN OS NO. 237/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOLENARASIPURA VIDE ANNEXURE -F.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30916 WP No. 20688 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner – defendant No.1 is before this Court calling in question an order dated 21.04.2025, passed by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Holenarasipura, on an application – I.A.No.VI filed under Section 151 of the CPC, in O.S.No.237/2022, whereby, police protection sought on the strength of an order of injunction granted on 18.11.2023, is allowed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has preferred an appeal before the first appellate Court calling in question the said order of injunction and he would seek to urge all these contentions before the first appellate Court. 3. In the light of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands disposed.
It is needless to observe that if all these submissions are made before the first appellate Court, the first appellate Court
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30916 WP No. 20688 of 2025
would consider the same and pass necessary orders in accordance with the law. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66 CT:SS