COCP No.1249 of IN THE H Gram Panchay Ve Happy and ano 1. The date w 2. The date w 3. The date w 4. Whether pronounce pronounce 5. The delay judgment, CORAM : HO HO Present : Mr for LAPITA BANE The petition alleging CWP No.210 o herein after: “ be No 2. The decided by an o 249 of 2025 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH COCP NO nchayat village Bora ...P Versus d another ...R date when the judgment is reserved date when the judgment is pronounce date when the judgment is uploaded ether only operative part of the ju nounced or whether the full jud nounced delay, if any of the pronounceme ment, and reasons thereof HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEP HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPIT Mr. Vishal Sharma (Vasudeva), Ad for the petitioner. ANERJI, J. The petitioner-Gram Panchayat lleging violation of the order dated J .210 of 2008. The order dated Janua Notice of motion for 11.02.20 In the meantime, status quo be maintained.” No notice has yet been issued in the The main writ petition being CWP y an order of even date and the impug JAB AND HARYANA AT P NO.1249 OF 2025 (O&M) ...Petitioner ...Respondents 28.01.2026 ounced 12.02.2026 aded 13.02.2026 the judgment is ll judgment is Full ncement of full Not applicable DEEPAK SIBAL APITA BANERJI Advocate, ayat filed the instant contempt ated January 09, 2008, passed in January 09, 2008 is reproduced 02.2008. quo regarding possession shall in the contempt petition. g CWP No.210 of 2008 has been impugned orders dated September SHALINI BHATIA 2026.02.13 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP No.1249 of 15, 2004 and Se set-aside. The in has been compl order passed in establishing of petitioner canno be passed in t disposed of. (DEEPAK SIB JUDGE FEBRUARY Shalini Whether speakin Whether reporta 249 of 2025 and September 13, 2007, challenged in The interim order dated January 09, 2 complained of by the Gram Panchaya sed in the writ petition by this Benc of the Gram Panchayat’s title cannot be evicted therefrom. Therefo d in the present contempt petition. SIBAL) (LA DGE 12, 2026 speaking/reasoned: Ye reportable: Ye ged in the writ petition, have been y 09, 2008, the violation of which nchayat has merged into the final s Bench by holding that prior to to the land in question, the herefore, no further order needs to tition. Accordingly, the same is (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No SHALINI BHATIA 2026.02.13 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document