APHC010048642021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3124/2021 Between: 1. M.VENUGOPAL NAIDU,, S/O. RAMA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O.KUPPANNAGARI PALLI, H/O. THIMMASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, MURAKAMBATTU POST, CHITTOOR MUNICIPALITY, CHITTOOR RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRAEDESH STATE. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHITTOOR TALUK POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. R CHANDRASEKHAR NAIDU, S/O. VEERASWAMYNAIDU, R/O. KODIGUNTA VILLAGE, H/O. 74-THIMMASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, MURUKUMBATTU POST, CHITTOOR RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. RAMINENI SANKAR NAIDU, S/O. VEERASWAMY NAIDU, R/O. KODIGUNTA VILLAGE, H/O. 74-THIMMASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, MURUKUMBATTU POST, CHITTOOR RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. RAMINENI MADHAVA NAIDU, S/O. VEERASWAMY NAIDU, R/O. KODIGUNTA VILLAGE, H/O. 74-THIMMASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, MURUKUMBATTU POST, CHITTOOR RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not provide police protection to the petitioner to enjoy the easement rights over the B-Schedule Cart Track is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice, consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to provide police protection to the petitioner to enjoy the easement rights over the B-Schedule Cart Track and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to provide police protection to the petitioner to enjoy the easement rights over the B-Schedule Cart Track pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3124 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not providing police protection to the petitioner to enjoy the easement rights over the B-Schedule Cart Track is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to provide police protection to the petitioner to enjoy the easement rights over the B-Schedule Cart Track and pass.…” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition as and when required. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition as and when required. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.10.2025. VNS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.3124 of 2021 Dated.07.10.2025 VNS 762