APHC010410942017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9815/2017 Between: 1. J. SURESH,, S/O. SWAMULU, AGED 33 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 4-42/1, GHEBROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. G. NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O. G. ESWARAIAH, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O. ROOM NO. 911, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. M. GIN KUMARI,, W/O. LATE. Y. ADINARAYANA, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. 618, RAINTREE APARTMENTS, NAMBURU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE LEGISLATURE, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, A.P. LEGISLATURE, HYDERABAD. 3. THE PAY ACCOUNTS OFFICER, HYDERBAD. ... ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto -issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the 3rd respondent in not releasing salaries to the petitioners inspite of fixation of pay of the petitioners as per Revised pay scales 2015 by the 2n respondent on mere technical reasons and further action of r respondent in not taking any action for accepting PRC bills of petitioners, inspite of letter addressed by the 2' respondent through Lr. No. 128/C1.1/2015, dated 08.12.2015, thereby 2 depriving the petitioners of their salaries and increments as per revised pay scales 2015 as highly illegal and arbitrary and contrary to G.O.Ms. No. 46, Finance (HRM.V-PC) Department, dated 30-04-2015 and also contrary tO orders of this Hon'ble Court and consequently-direct the respondents to pay the arrears, salaries, increments and other allowances due to petitioners as per Revised pay scale Rules 2015 issued vide G.O.Ms. No. 46, Finance (HRM.V-PC) Department, dated 30-04-2015 and pass such order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of this case. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAW LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS (AP) 2. GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING (AP) The court made the following ORDER: When the matter is called, Sri D. Viswakanth Babu, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and the cause in the writ petition does not survive. Hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 28.11.2025 GVK 3 355 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.9815 of 2017 Date: 28.11.2025 GVK