Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55866 (KAR)

NAVEEN v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/5160/2025 · 2025-10-13

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40266 CRL.P No. 5160 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5160 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. NAVEEN S/O SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT No. HOOVINAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN – 573 201. PRESENTLY R/O P W D QUARTERS, HASSAN – 573 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI YOGESH G, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ALUR POLICE STATION, REP. BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. VENKATESH FATHER OF VICTIM AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/O AT No. BOOMMANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN – 573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PUSHPALATHA B, ADDL. SPP FOR R1 V/O DTD. 11.07.2025, NOTICE TO R2 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40266 CRL.P No. 5160 of 2025 THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 Cr.PC PRAYING TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON REGULAR BAIL IN SPL.C.No.496/2024 (CRIME No.145/2024) OF RESPONDENT ALUR POLICE STATION, HASSAN, REGISTERED FOR ALLEGED OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 4, 6 OF PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 2012 AND UNDER SECTION 376 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE. PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED IN THE COURT OF ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE FTSC-1 AT HASSAN DISTRICT AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. 2. Memo reads thus; “The under singed council for petitioners in the above case pray that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to Permit to withdraw the above matter as not presses in the interest of justice and equity.” 3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 21