IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 112 Lakhmi Chand Dakshin CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) 1. against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the suit filed by the injunction 2. admits that the question of law involved in the present appeal as to whether jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred in view of Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has since been decided by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in ‘Mahesh judgment dated 14.05.2025. RSA-4961-2019 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.4961 of 2019 Date of decision :-23.07.2025 Lakhmi Chand Versus Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and another CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondents. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellant/plaintiff has against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff injunction and mandatory injunction has been At the very outset, learned counsel for that the question of law involved in the present appeal as to whether jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred in view of Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has since been decided by the e Division Bench of this Court in ‘Mahesh Kumar vs. Sub Divisional Officer and Another judgment dated 14.05.2025. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.4961 of 2019 (O & M) .2025 …..Appellant Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and another …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Bharat Bhushan, Advocate /plaintiff has filed the present appeal against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby appellant/plaintiff for declaration, permanent has been dismissed. outset, learned counsel for appellant/plaintiff that the question of law involved in the present appeal as to whether jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred in view of Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has since been decided by the e Division Bench of this Court in RSA-4181-2016, titled as Sub Divisional Officer and Another’ vide VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.25 20.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. objection’, in case, the present second appeal is judgment dated 14.05.2025 (supra). 4. dismissed. appropriate remedy as 5. July 23, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No RSA-4961-2019 (O & M) Learned counsel for the objection’, in case, the present second appeal is judgment dated 14.05.2025 (supra). In view of the above, the present dismissed. However, the appellant is at liberty to take recourse to the appropriate remedy as available, in accordance with Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff has ‘no objection’, in case, the present second appeal is dismissed, in terms of the present second appeal is is at liberty to take recourse to the , in accordance with law. application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.25 20.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document