138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28151-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:24.03.2025 Bahadur Singh and others ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Ms. Dilpreet Kaur, Advocate, for Mr. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J. (Oral) 1. On the last date of hearing, the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed for yet another adjournment for impleading one of the accused, namely, Sunil in the present FIR. A perusal of the last order dated 15.10.2024 would show that earlier also the learned counsel for the petitioners sought adjournment on the same ground and that was the third adjournment and therefore, the present is the fourth adjournment sought by the learned counsel for the petitioners. The request for an adjournment made by the learned counsel for the petitioners is accepted, subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as costs, which shall be deposited by the petitioners before the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association Lawyers Family Welfare Fund. Adjourned to 24.03.2025. RAKESH KUMAR 2025.03.24 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-28151-2024 (O&M) -2- 2. Today, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that neither the cost has been paid nor the counsel has been able to contact the petitioners. 3. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. 24.03.2025 (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) rakesh JUDGE Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAKESH KUMAR 2025.03.24 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment