Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55860 (AP)

Palagandla Vengaiah, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/9049/2020 · 2025-09-17

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010147992020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 9049/2020 Between: 1. PALAGANDLA VENGAIAH,, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O1-12, KOTALAPALLI VILLAGE, VELIGANDLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT (ASSIGNMENT), REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, AT ONGOLE. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKURU REVENUE DIVISION, KANDUKURU TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, VELIGANDLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TENEPALLI NIRANJAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 in initiating hectic steps to dispossess the petitioner from his land (classified as Bandi Daari/Cart track) admeasuring 20 cents in S.No.251/1, situated at Kotalapalli Village, Veligandla Mandal, Prakasam District, for the programme of Navaratnalu Pedalandariki Illu. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the concerned respondent authorities would follow the due procedure with respect to the subject land, if so warranted, for any public purpose. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, if the respondent Nos.2 to 4 have not already utilized the same for the above said public purpose, the subject land shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted, for any public purpose. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim orders, if any, stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 18.09.2025 PNS 3