1 2025:CGHC:58382 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7662 of 2025 Ku. Vandana Yadav D/o Late Shri Milan Ram Yadav, Aged About 55 Years Lecturer (Chemistry) (T), Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Nalpawand, Block- Bakawand District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - The Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction Chhattisgarh Raipur, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - The Collector-Cum-District Level Chairman Uktiuktkaran Samiti, Bastar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) 4 - The Joint Director Education Division Bastar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) 5 - The District Education Officer, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Smt. Swati Patel, Lecturer (Chemistry) Government Higher Secondary School Borpadar, Block- Bakawand District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) 7 - Smt. Pushpa Kumari Kunwar, Lecturer (Chemistry) Government Higher Secondary School Ranjana, Block Katghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Avinash K. Mishra, Advocate For State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.12.05 13:24:16 +0530 2 02.12.2025 1. The petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition assailing order dated 02.06.2025 by which the petitioner has been treated as surplus teacher. The petitioner has also prayed for restraining the respondents No. 4 and 5 to relieve/joining. 2. It has been informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already joined the transferred place of posting and thereafter she has filed an appeal before the respondent authorities assailing her transfer. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has preferred representation before Divisional Level Rationalization Committee and the said representation has been rejected by them vide order dated 08.10.2025. He would further submit that the instant petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach before the State Level Rationalization Committee raising her grievance and the State Level Rationalization Committee may kindly be directed to consider the grievance raised by the petitioner in accordance with law. 4. Since vide order dated 08.10.2025 the Commissioner Rationalization Committee has already rejected the representation, the petitioner is at liberty to avail alternate remedy available to the petitioner before the State Level Rationalization Committee. 5. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of granting aforesaid liberty in favor of the petitioner. It is directed that the concerned authority shall consider representation preferred by the petitioner within a period of 04 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika