- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25809 WP No. 23505 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.23505 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. GOPALA REDDY S/O LATE OBALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, 2. SRI. B.G.HARIPRASAD S/O GOPALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 3. SRI. B.G.ARUNKUMAR S/O GOPALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT NO.129, SRINIDHI KADIBISANAHALLI PANATHUR MAIN ROAD BEHIND SWATHI DELUXE HOTEL BANGALORE-560 103. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUNIL T., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. CHIEF SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25809 WP No. 23505 of 2022 PUBLIC RIGHTS GRIEVANCES CELL KOLAR DIVISION, KOLAR-563 101. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563 103. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB-DIVISION MAGISTRATE KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563 101. 5. THE THASILDHAR MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563 130. 6. TALUKA SURVEYOR OFFICE OF THE THASILDHAR MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563 130. 7. SMT. ANITHA ASHOK W/O C.ASHOK AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.13, C. MANJUNATHA COTTAGE NAGAVARAPALYA C.V.RAMAN NAGAR BANGALORE-560 093. 8. SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE YELLAPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O BARAGURU LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563 130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R.1 TO R.6; R.7 SERVED; SRI. V.F. KUMBAR, ADVOCATE FOR R.8.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25809 WP No. 23505 of 2022 QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.11.2022 VIDE I.N.A/C.R/24/2021-22 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.5 ORDERED FOR EVICTION OF THE PETITIONERS FROM THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION THE AT ANNEXURE-L AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER No representation on behalf of the petitioners. On the last occasion also, no representation was made on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.8 is present. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned HCGP and the learned counsel for respondent No.8, what is challenged in the writ petition is the Notice dated 02.11.2022 (Annexure-L) issued by respondent No.5. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is not - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25809 WP No. 23505 of 2022 maintainable to challenge the notice as per Annexure-L to the writ petition. 4. Learned counsel for respondent No.8 also placed on record the order dated 04.12.2024 passed in M.A.No.36/2022 on the file of I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar, wherein, the appeal preferred by one Ramalingappa has been dismissed. In that view of the matter, no further order is required in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59