IN THE HIGH Sr. No.123 Misru and another State of Haryana CORAM : HON HON Present : Mr. Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL, 1. Lear be satisfied if the No.2-Deputy Com 19.11.2025 (Anne 2. Lear if the above prayer 3. Acco the writ petition is on the representati by passing a speak parties and in acc receipt of a copy o 4. Need petitioners and if t at liberty to challen 21.01.2026 Prince HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARY nother Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BA Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petiti r. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. * * * * * IBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners su if the present writ petition is disposed y Commissioner, Nuh to take a decis (Annexure P-3), submitted by the petition Learned State counsel, who appears on prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without com ition is disposed of with a direction to re sentation dated 19.11.2025 (Annexure P a speaking order and after granting oppo in accordance with law, preferably with copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so nd if the decision is not to the satisfactio challenge the same, in accordance with la Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / Whether reportable : Yes / ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-38001-2025 Date of decision: 21.01.2026 …. Petitioners ..... Respondent AK SIBAL A BANERJI petitioners. submits that at this stage, he would posed of with a direction to respondent decision on the representation dated etitioners. ars on advance notice, has no objection ut commenting on the merits of the case, to respondent No.2 to take a decision xure P-3), submitted by the petitioners g opportunity of hearing to all affected ly within two months from the date of ion so taken be communicated to the faction of the petitioners, they would be with law. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No 2026 dents would ndent dated ection case, cision s, fected ate of to the uld be PRINCE SAINI 2026.01.22 05:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document